@nadonomy

1. I have already linked the issue for this change.
2. No. I'm not sure

To add to the first question. I think text blurring was OK, but blurring for images was insufficient. See: element-hq/element-meta#1545

To add to the first question. I think text blurring was OK, but blurring for images was insufficient. See: vector-im/element-meta#1545

I also think the text blurring was OK, it actually looked roughly like words, so I could understand it to be hidden words. In the context of a timeline, I think that's important. The after screenshot blur looks alien to the concept of words, so I think it might actually make things a bit harder to understand that it's text on the timeline?

For the image spoiler not being blurred enough, I don't think it's solved by this.

Before

After

Someone showed me this the other week - using blurhash for media placeholders. I wonder if there's a way to use styling like this for the image spoiler?

Yeah, that's exactly what I meant about images. That kind of blurring is insufficient.

@niquewoodhouse Yes, using blurhash for rendering initial spoiler preview would be a great idea. For now, increasing the intensity of spoiler images looks good. The result would look something like this:

What do you think?

The maxed out blur is for sure much better than before. Still not ideal though, since you can make out some shapes.

It can be further increased. There's no upper bound.

IMO increasing the blur intensity of all spoilers isn't the right way to approach the problem, since currently images can only be spoilered by inserting them inline in a textual message, which is somewhat of a hack. I expect that a spec change will be needed to properly support image spoilers, at which point it will hopefully be easy to handle images separately from text spoilers (e.g. by showing a blurhash)

Actually, images inside spoilers can be targeted and can be given a different blur. That is what I did in this comment. That way we won't disturb the other text spoilers.

Had a conversation about this today - we think image spoilers should be implemented using blurhash instead of this way. We would very happily accept PRs for that, but I now think this PR is irrelevant, so closing it.

Thanks very much for your contribution!